publications-invent-emlyon

InvEnt Research

Our faculty regularly has its work published in the leading management journals. This includes A+ and A journals along with those ranked B+. We invite you now to visit the profiles of individual scholars in our centre for more information.

Enhancing Transparency and Replicability in Entrepreneurship Research with Preregistrations, Registered Reports, and Registered Revisions: A Call for Papers

By Katharina Fellnhofer, Karl Wennberg, Thomas H. Allison, Pia ARENIUS, Moren Lévesque, J. Jeffrey Gish and Jeffrey M. Pollack

Published May 1, 2026

Extrait de transcription de dialogue avec schémas montrant une personne assise effectuant un mouvement de tête, accompagnés de texte explicatif.
Entrepreneurial pitching is normally framed as a unidirectional scripted performance, with entrepreneurs presenting pre-crafted narratives for investor evaluation. We reframe pitching as an interactional process in which stories are scrutinised, challenged, and negotiated through investor-entrepreneur exchanges. We apply sequential analysis to video recordings of the question-and-answer sessions of 14 investment pitches in the UK. Our analysis identifies four recurrent interactional patterns: Unencumbered Storytelling, Resisting Presuppositions, Giving Ground, and Pushing Back. We also show how collective investor dynamics can further shape the trajectory of the pitch story. These findings demonstrate that investors are not passive evaluators but active participants whose individual interventions and collective questioning trajectories enable and constrain entrepreneurial storytelling. By foregrounding the interactional dynamics of pitching, we shift understanding of entrepreneurial storytelling, viewing it as a negotiated process rather than a scripted performance, and highlighting how the persuasiveness of entrepreneurial narratives depends on their capacity to accommodate investor challenges while preserving the integrity of the story.
 

Reference:
Jean Clarke and Nick Llewellyn, Stories under scrutiny: How entrepreneurs and investors negotiate entrepreneurial narratives in interactional exchanges during investment pitches. Journal of Business Venturing, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2026.106604

Discover more

 

Stories under scrutiny: How entrepreneurs and investors negotiate entrepreneurial narratives in interactional exchanges during investment pitches

By Jean Clarke and Nick Llewellyn in Journal of Business Venturing

Published April 16, 2026

 Cartoon illustration contrasting traditional and modern research practices: researchers build a fragile wooden tower labeled “Published Results,” while a separate building labeled “Stage 1” and “Stage 2” shows a structured, transparent research process with a person working on a laptop.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice ( ETP ) is committed to advancing transparency, replicability, credibility, and rigor in research. To support this commitment, we encourage authors to preregister their research plans, submit empirical studies as Registered Reports, and engage with our evolving editorial processes, such as Registered Revisions. Drawing on practices across multiple disciplines, we offer guidance for integrating these publication formats into our field. We also provide multiple resources to support authors in adopting these approaches and to address the unique challenges of applying such formats to, for example, secondary data. By more widely embracing the Registered Report approach, we envision a future for entrepreneurship research that is characterized by greater credibility, replicability, transparency, and scientific impact. In this editorial, we motivate and, hopefully, guide future work by making a specific call for manuscripts for a virtual special issue of ETP focused on Registered Reports, strengthening ETP ’s longstanding commitment to methodological innovation. We offer a prospective vision—what we believe would be good for future literature—and our aim is to empower scholars to proactively shape new theoretical and empirical foundations in entrepreneurship research that enhance the credibility and replicability of entrepreneurship research.
 

Discover more

The power of expressed humility: Early stage investors' reaction to humble entrepreneurs

By Laurent Vilanova and Ivana VITANOVA

Published February 5, 2026

 Business professionals shaking hands across a desk during a meeting, symbolizing trust, collaboration, and investor–entrepreneur agreement in a corporate setting.

Research Summary: We examine how entrepreneur-expressed humility affects early stage investors' willingness to fund new ventures. In pitching contexts where investors rely on relational cues and implicit prototypes of entrepreneurs , we theorize three distinct pathways through which expressed humility shapes funding decisions. First, building on research regarding interpersonal signals in early stage valuation, we propose that humility fosters perceptions of interpersonal affect and trust and team-building qualities, increasing investors' willingness to fund. Second, drawing on implicit leadership theories, we argue that humility may trigger negative perceptions regarding the entrepreneur's ability to make rapid and risky decisions. Across a video-metric analysis of 140 real-world pitches and a randomized experiment with French early stage investors, we show that expressed humility elicits both pathways, but investors prioritize positive attributions.  

Discover more

  • Smith, B., Dubard Barbosa, S., Discua Cruz, A., Radu-Lefebvre, M. (2026). Religious entrepreneurship: advancing a distinctive domain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 38(5-6), 489-500.https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2026.2660951

  • Bergemann, P., Brandtner, C. (2025). Territoriality and the Emergence of Norms During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Sociology, 130 (5), 1150-1216 p. https://doi.org/10.1086/733799
  • Biru, A., Arenius, P., Bruton, G. D., Gilbert, D. (2025). Firm Formalization Strategy: The Interaction of Entrepreneurs and Government Officials in the Enforcement of Regulation. Journal of Management, 51 (4), 1586-1618 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231224332
  • Klyver, K., van Burg, E., Hou, Y., Elfring, T. (2025). Network agency in entrepreneurship: A synthesis and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi/10.1177/10422587251347058
  • Brandtner, C., Ashur, P., and Srinivasa Desikan, B. 2025. “Dynamic persistence of institutions: Modeling the historical endurance of Red Vienna’s public housing utopia.” 2025. Organization Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01708406251317258
  • Li, Y., Chi, T., Lan, S., Wang, Q. (2025). Venture capital exit after venture IPO. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 19 (1), 111-144 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1515
  • Rostain, M., Clarke, J. (2025). Meaningful work through craft: How workers in low-skilled roles engage in anomalous craft to gain autonomy and receive recognition. Organization Studies, 46 (1), 7-34 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241295504
  • Alinasab, J., Khvatova, T., Caputo, F., Mirahmadi, S. M. R. (2025). Small firms’ foreign market entry framework: rational and cognitive perspectives. International Marketing Review, 42 (2-3), 386-411 p. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-08-2023-0204
  • Claes, B., Siraz, S., De Castro, J., Lapeyre, E.M. (2025). What is the quack about? Legitimation strategies and their perceived appropriateness in the foie gras industry. European Management Review, 22(1), 202–217.
  • de Roo, M., Wickert, C., de Bakker, F. G. A., Elfring, T. (2025). From seller to broker: When and how issue sellers engage with external stakeholders to sell issues inside organizations. Strategic Organization, 23 (3), 520-547 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241276590
  • Drăgan, G. B., Ben Arfi, W., Tiberius, V., Ammari, A., Khvatova, T. (2025). Navigating the green wave: Understanding behavioral antecedents of sustainable cryptocurrency investment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210, 17 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123909
  • Jackson, M., Brandtner, C. (2025). “Institutional exclusion: The cultural production of educational inequality through college narratives.” Social Forces. https://academic.oup.com/sf/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/sf/soaf099/8198253
  • Khvatova, T., Shchegolev, V., & Arvidsson, H. (2025). Push-pull factors, gender challenges and coping strategies in female technology-based entrepreneurship in Russia. Management International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.59876/a-196p-xa5s
  • de Roo, M., Wickert, C., van der Laan, G., Elfring, T., Zapkau, F. (2025). Examining the financial slack–corporate social performance relationship across countries: The influence of formal institutions. Journal of International Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101278
  • Siraz, S.; Claes, B.; Sanchez-Preciado, D.; Theodorakopoulos, N., (2025). Community socioemotional wealth as the glue that binds distinct communities in enterprising: A tale of success from Colombia. Journal of Management Inquiry, 34(4), 416–438.
  • Yanto, C., Clarke, J., Holt, R., Kincaid, P. A., Short, J. C and Wolfe, M. T. (2025). Aesthetic Appeal: How Images Inform Emerging Entrepreneurial Themes. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. Online First, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00552
  • Maier, F., Zheng, W., Brandtner, C., Cornips, L. (2025). The Many Indicators of Nonprofit Success as Seen by Nonprofit Leaders. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 35 (4), 751-763 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21641
  • Simoni, M., Khvatova, T. (2025). Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Business in A Platform-Shaped Society: A Multi-Level Approach. Innovations: Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 46 (1), 1-16 p. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.046.0001

  • Fišar, M., Greiner, B., Huber, C., Katok, E., Ozkes, A. I., Schoch, D. S., Management Science Reproducibility. Collaboration (2024). Reproducibility in Management Science. Management Science, 70 (3), 1343-1356 p. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03556
  • Smith, C., Rondi, E., de Massis, A., Nordqvist, M. (2024). Rising Every Time We Fall: Organizational Fortitude and Response to Adversities. Journal of Management, 50 (5), 1865-1910 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231164969
  • Ben Nasr, I., Kondrateva, G., Khvatova, T., Ben Arfi, W. (2024). The Role of Contact-Tracing Mobile Apps in Pandemic Prevention: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Health Beliefs, Social, and Technological Factors. Social Science & Medicine, 358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117204
  • Brandtner, C., Powell, W W., Horvath, A. (2024). From Iron Cage to Glass House: Repurposing of bureaucratic management and the turn to openness. Organization Studies, 45 (2), 193-221 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231200727
  • Chaigneau, P., Chang, W-J, Hillegeist, S. A. (2024). Performance measure skewness and the structure of CEO compensation: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 41 (3), 1754-1784 p. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12959
  • Clarke, J., Hurst, C., Tomlinson, J. (2024). Maintaining the meritocracy myth: A critical discourse analytic study of leaders’ talk about merit and gender in academia. Organization Studies, 45 (5), 635-660 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241236610
  • Dubard Barbosa, S., Smith, B. (2024). Specifying the role of religion in entrepreneurial action: A cognitive perspective. Small Business Economics, 62 (4), 1315-1336 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00839-2
  • Gonzalez, A., Brandtner, C. (2024). Green in their own way: Pragmatic and progressive means for cities to overcome institutional barriers to sustainability. Urban Studies, 61 (13), 2513-2530 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980241239788
  • Khvatova, T., Appio, F. P., Ray, S., Schiavone, F. (2024). Exploring the Role of AI in B2B Customer Journey Management: Towards an IPO Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13852-13866 p. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3284532
  • Loi, M., Castriotta, M., Dubard Barbosa, S., Di Guardo, M. C., Fayolle, A. (2024). Entrepreneurial intention studies: A hybrid bibliometric method to identify new directions for theory and research. European Management Review, 21 (3), 581-604 p. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12599
  • Alperovych, Y., Calcagno, R., Lentz, M. (2024). Entrepreneurs on their financial literacy: Evidence from the Netherlands. Venture Capital, 25 (4), 377-400 p. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2234078
  • Arenius, P., Lenz, A.-K. (2024). Beyond the paradigm of literacy - Developing a research agenda in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 21, 8 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00442
  • Quas, A., Alperovych, Y., Le Pendeven, B. (2024). The role of personality traits in entrepreneurial finance. Venture Capital, 26 (2), 101-107 p. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2024.2319359
  • Gabay-Mariani, L., Dubard Barbosa, S. (2024). Understanding Entrepreneurial Commitment: A Test of Side-Bet Theory. M@n@gement, 27 (4), 37-57 p. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2024.8653
  • Maier, F., Zheng, W., Brandtner, C., & Cornips, L. 2024. “The many indicators of nonprofit success as seen by nonprofit leaders.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nml.21641
  • Brandtner, C., Laryea, K., Park, G., Luo, W., Meyer, M., Suárez, D., Hwang, H., Powell, W. W. (2024). Neighborhood effects on integrative organizational practices in five global cities. Nature Cities, 1 (12), 853-860 p. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00154-1